On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 1:10 PM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 9:07 PM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:36 AM Ricardo Robaina <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently, NETFILTER_PKT records lack source and destination
> > > port information, which is often valuable for troubleshooting.
> > > This patch series adds ports numbers, to NETFILTER_PKT records.
> > >
> > > The first patch refactors netfilter-related code, by moving
> > > duplicated code to audit.c, by creating audit_log_nf_skb()
> > > helper function.
> > > The second one, improves the NETFILTER_PKT records, by
> > > including source and destination ports for protocols of
> > > interest.
> > >
> > > Ricardo Robaina (2):
> > >   audit: add audit_log_nf_skb helper function
> > >   audit: include source and destination ports to NETFILTER_PKT
> > >
> > >  include/linux/audit.h    |   8 ++
> > >  kernel/audit.c           | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  net/netfilter/nft_log.c  |  58 +-------------
> > >  net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c |  58 +-------------
> > >  4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
> >
> > Thanks Ricardo, both patches look good to me, I'm going to merge them
> > into audit/dev-staging just to get some very basic testing, but if I
> > can get an ACK from Florian on the patchset I'll go ahead and move the
> > patches over to audit/dev (feeds into linux-next and the next merge
> > window).
>
> I just moved these patches in audit/dev with Florian's ACK.  Thanks everyone!
>
> --
> paul-moore.com
>

I'm happy to hear it. Thanks, Paul and Florian!


Reply via email to