[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Ah. The branch is cramfs and these are empty directories.
> Would cloop work any better than cramfs? Or another version of cramfs
> (you mention that it is the one in linux stable).

Actually I didn't test cloop on aufs by myself, but someone else might
use it. Anyway I don't know/remember any problem around cloop problem.

I've read a patch (or something) for cramfs not to cause this issue, but
I don't remember where it was.


Junjiro Okajima

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4

Reply via email to