Hello Rui, "G.R.": > I tried to first lazily umount a fs and then delete the corresponding branch > in a aufs mount. > To achieve this, I had to uncomment the 'delete by index' option and > recompile the code. > However, this scheme only results in a Kernel BUG saying that the system is > trying to free > a cache that is still in use. I currently do not have a trace at hand but it > is quite easy to > reproduce, at least in the version 20081208. I think this 'bug' suggests > that there must still > be some un-released references in aufs. Could you digg into this problem?
Unfortunately I don't understand your situation. And 'idel' option works on my test environment. Give me these info please. (from README) When you have any problems or strange behaviour in aufs, please let me know with: - /proc/mounts (instead of the output of mount(8)) - /sys/fs/aufs/* (if you have them) - /sys/module/aufs/* - linux kernel version if your kernel is not plain, for example modified by distributor, the url where i can download its source is necessary too. - aufs version which was printed at loading the module or booting the system, instead of the date you downloaded. - configuration (define/undefine CONFIG_AUFS_xxx, or plain local.mk is used or not) - kernel configuration or /proc/config.gz (if you have it) - behaviour which you think to be incorrect - actual operation, reproducible one is better - mailto: aufs-users at lists.sourceforge.net J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
