Whoops! Looks like I sent my reply earlier just to you. Back to the list for posterity.
sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > I don't know whether aufs is related to the problem or not either. But I > will dive into it. > Yay! > - I need to make sure that your aufs2-29 is the latest one. Will you > show me the output of "git show aufs2-29"? > $ git show commit 8e2b127a7531aa93ef244eeac91d7b2a9bfb672c Merge: 5d547bc... bdd2a9f... Author: J. R. Okajima <hooano...@yahoo.co.jp> Date: Fri Apr 3 22:33:38 2009 +0900 Merge branch 'aufs2-28' into aufs2-29 > - Enabling CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG may find the problem. So please try it. > - If you have applied other patches to your kernel, please let me know. > The only other patch is grsecurity. Particularly the patch found here: http://grsecurity.net/test/grsecurity-2.1.14-2.6.29.1-200904092011.patch > Since the problem happens on one machine only, we may need to check the > memory by memtest (or something). But its priority is not high because > the probability is low. Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's not the memory. I think it's more just a symptom of craptastic users on the machine. Some of which are being moved off. If this is all a result of the users, I may not be able to reproduce it again. > By the way, are you "pmlane-ndn"? If so, I will do my best with my > appriciation to your donation. > Yes sir, but I promise the donation was long over due, and not made simply because I had a question! :) I am building a kernel with the patch you provided in the other e-mail and turning on debugging. I will distribute it to several machines instead of just the one so we also have a few controls. I'll let you know what pops up. Thank you for your attention! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
