On Wednesday 2010-07-07 09:46, Tomas M wrote: > >> Writing a report will not harm much for my aufs work. The report will be >> something like how to use squashfs and aufs (or other module) >> effectively. I am not sure it will be whether "the current use in SLAX >> is best" or "there is another better way". > >So I would say the most problems do not lay with squashfs, but rather with >the tmpfs/ondisk_changes. Users would like to see some way of SNAPSHOTing, >e.g. a possibility to switch between different 'changes versions' on the fly, >and save the changes to any filesystem, but I think this is impossible :)
Just exchange the rw layer - or add another one. (That's how tree-based snapshots in VMware would work.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
