On 02/13/11 03:26, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > Oliver Schinagl: >> naturally, i can no longer reproduce it after reloading the recompiled >> module. I'll keep using the patched module and hopefully the problem > ::: > > Hmm, as I wrote the patch doesn't affect the behaviour, just prints the > debug information. Strange... > > >> files that where there. I'm now guessing I may have forgotten to umount >> my aufs'd tree while copying/removing some of the files on the >> underlaying FS, but not sure now. > If you directly modify the files in the branch (bypassing aufs), the > mount option "udba=notify" is necessary. > i only modify the brach, when my aufs'd tree isn't mounted. That is ok right? umount, modify, mount? > J. R. Okajima
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
