On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 08:48 -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: > On Sun January 1 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 11:58 +0900, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > > Thorsten Glaser: > > > > >It introduces a new separated file include/linux/aufs_name.h. > > > > > > > > Isn=E2=80=99t that a bit overkill? > > > > > > Hmm, I may have to agree with that. > > > Honestly speaking, I don't like this approach. > > > But embedding (expanding) AUFS_NAME is worse for me. > > > > Why, how often do you expect to change AUFS_NAME? > > > > Probably as often as Linux-2.6.x is changed to Linux-3.x > ;-)
Which isn't an important difference in terms of compatibility. > For instance, this page: > http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/aufs-tools > In the side-bar lists the matching 2.6.26 kernel modules. [...] No, they are not matching; they are part of the 'lenny' (oldstable) release. Since 'squeeze', aufs modules are included in the Linux kernel packages (linux-image-<version>-<flavour>). I think the list or 'similar packages' is generated based only on textual similarity of name and description. It probably should be limited to packages that are included in the same release/suite. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings All the simple programs have been written, and all the good names taken.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
