Hi,
If I enter tty, /dev/console is returned. I did some comparisons of a Rhel
6.1 build and the Rhel 6.3 when I am put into the bash shell at boot. The
environment seems the same at that point, or I have not found a difference
that would cause an issue yet. Do you know what is doing the open(/dev/tty)
call?
On another note:
I tried to use a newer C compiler and ran into the following error during
the build:
CC [M] arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.o - due to target missing
CC [M] fs/autofs4/init.o - due to target missing
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
fs/aufs/super.c: In function au_statfs_sum:
fs/aufs/super.c:325: error: passing argument 1 of vfs_statfs from
incompatible pointer type
include/linux/fs.h:1867: note: expected struct path * but argument is of
type struct dentry *
fs/aufs/super.c: In function aufs_statfs:
fs/aufs/super.c:356: error: passing argument 1 of vfs_statfs from
incompatible pointer type
include/linux/fs.h:1867: note: expected struct path * but argument is of
type struct dentry *
make[3]: *** [fs/aufs/super.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC [M] crypto/vmac.o - due to target missing
CC [M] crypto/xcbc.o - due to target missing
CC [M] crypto/crypto_null.o - due to target missing
make[2]: *** [fs/aufs] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
On 06/20/12, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
[1]tisja...@verizon.net:
> 84 execve(= "/sbin/mount.aufs", ["/sbin/mount.aufs", "aufs&quo= t;,
"/memfs/union", "-n", "-o",
> "rw,br:/= memfs/rootfs=3Drw:/memfs/in"...], [/* 10 vars */]) =3D 0
> 84 = uname({sys=3D"Linux", node=3D"(none)", ...= }) =3D 0
> 84 open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR|O_NOCT= TY|O_NONBLOCK) =3D -1 ENXIO (No such
device or address)
> 84 = --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
You found the point.
/sbin/mount.aufs tried opening /dev/tty, but there is no such entry on
your system.
- I don't know why open("/dev/tty") is issued. I'd suggest the C runtime
startup routine on your system (or your build envionment).
- Also I'd suggest you to investigate why your system doesn't have
/dev/tty. Since you executed this mount command from your initrd or
initramfs, it should have /dev/console which is equivalent to
/dev/tty, isnt' it?
By the way, would make your mail to follow the standard format?
Your mail message doesn't have some necessary header fields, and it is
very hard for me to read your mail.
J. R. Okajima
References
1. mailto:tisja...@verizon.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
