Hi, Okajima, Sorry did not notice your reply till today when cleaning up the inbox. Got too many emails from the kernel mailing list.
> In your case, the size of the XINO files grows too much and got ENOSPC. > > While I don't remember the detail of aufs2.2 (which is unsupported now), > the truncation might not be enabled by default for jffs2. > > Read the auf smanual and try one of these aufs mount options > - trunc_xino > - trunc_xino_v=%d:%d > - trunc_xino=%s > - itrunc_xino=%d > - trunc_xib > You can confirm the size and the consumed number of blocks via > /debug/aufs/si_<id> dir if you mount debugfs. > Or you can put the XINO files other that your first writable branch by > specifying "xino=" mount option. I'll try the XINO options and let you know. Having been off the project for a while, but will give it another try in the coming days. > But why do you need to decrement PATH_MAX? As to why PATH_MAX needs to be 1 smaller, it is because jffs2 uses up one character such that it would not build or work with the original size. Appreciate your active work on the aufs! Thank you. -Minghua On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:57 AM, <sf...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: ... > J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
