On 28/04/14 05:17, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > Hello Nikolay, > > Nikolay Pertsev: >> I am wondering if aufs tmpfs memory leak was fixed. > > I don't think it "memory leak." > > >> It was mentioned in the mail list on November 07, 2012 > > And the story continued to the next Jan... and Sep 2013 when I > introduced a new logic to trucate XINO files. > > >> And there was even solution found: >> >> To mount aufs partition with "trunc_xino" option > > For tmpfs, it is enabled automatically. > If you have HDD, then you can specify "xino=/dir/file/on/HDD." > According to past mails, Jacek Konieczny chose "noxino" option. > > My recommendation is > - check the size and the number of the consumed blocks of XINO files via > debugfs and make sure they are big pressure for tmpfs. > - use latest aufs to see the effect of new truncation algorythm > (implemented in Sep 2013) > - try the mount option "xino=/dir/file/on/HDD" if you can. > > The last resort which I don't recommend is "noxino" option. > > > J. R. Okajima
Hi, I also can reproduce the +4k problem with the procedure described here http://serverfault.com/q/445445/145512 and linux-3.13.3 + current aufs development HEAD. So, what is the problem now? Is this by design or is this still a bug? Thanks, Justin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
