J.R. sure, no worries. I will manage it just fine. I just pointed out my findings and release a patch. That's all. I know the story with aufs and Canonical/Debian. You do a great job with aufs. Those hickups can be handled with ease.
kind regards Phil Am 18.01.2015 um 19:34 schrieb sf...@users.sourceforge.net: > Hello Rob, > > Rob McCathie: >> Just thought i'd mention that although EOL at kernel.org, 3.16 is going >> to be maintained by Canonical and then Debian for years to come. > The basic policy release aufs is > - against linux mainline > - against linux-stable releases > which means that aufs is distribution-neutral. > > If Canonical/Debian's 3.16 series were listed on www.kernel.org (and > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git > contained it), then aufs would support it. > Additionally Canonial Ubuntu had expressed that they don't want aufs and > stopped updating several years ago. If Canonical/Debian kernel want > aufs, then they should easily merge by git-pull (and merge) and > git-cherry-pick as usual I guess. > > > J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
