On 27/07/15 00:36, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, OmegaPhil wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday 25 May 2015 04:55 PM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>>>> Ritesh Raj Sarraf:
>>>>> Anyways, in the standalone tree, there are a bunch of patches with no
>>>>> order defined. Is it to assume that they can all be applied randomly ?
>>>> No.
>>>> Please refer to README file in aufs4-standalone.git.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yup. That one explain. Sorry. I completely missed that file.
>>>
>>>>> I was hoping if we can have a standalone/dkms tree, which could build a
>>>>> kernel module out, easily loadable in the respective kernel ??
>>>> Patching is neccessary (by either manually or GIT), which means you will
>>>> need another kernel as long as debian kernel is unpatched.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then it may not fit in the bill of dkms. Let me check with Ben on how he
>>> supported it for Jessie.
>>
>>
>> Did this go anywhere? I'm on Debain Testing, the recent upgrade to v4
>> kernel completely bricked aufs volumes on the 2 machines I use it on
>> locally because they removed this (and where was the acceptability of
>> such a removal discussed?  Nothing comes up on a search)...
> 
> The aufs patches to the kernel are included in Debian packages again as
> of Linux 4.1 which will go into unstable soon.  You will still have to
> build the module separately.
> 
> Ben.


Thanks, I'll keep an eye on the kernel and install it from unstable when
it appears, and start building this module now.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to