OK, Thank you!

2016-02-12 19:00 GMT+09:00  <sf...@users.sourceforge.net>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Akihiro Suda:
>> A recent Docker issue reports that AUFS does not work with `fcntl(fd,
>> F_SETFL, O_APPEND)`.
>> How to reproduce the situation is also attached in the issue ticket.
>> https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/20199
>
> Thanx for reporting.
>
>
>> I found a workaround which disables `aufs_write()` and uses
>> `aufs_write_iter()` instead, even for non-vectorized `write()` calls.
>
> I'd rather try implementing filp->check_flags() instead of removing
> ->write().
>
> Generaly the behaviour of aufs fcntl() (and also ioctl()) may not be
> good. Because the "file" or "filp" object in aufs, which is refered to
> by "file descriptor", differs from the one on the branch filesystem. The
> branch fs's filp is a real one, but aufs's is virtual. User handles a
> virtual filp. If VFS prepared a method (operation) to support fs
> specific fcntl(), aufs implemented it and fcntl() would be fully
> supported. Currently there seems not to exist such method.
> I will dive more when I have time.
>
>
> J. R. Okajima

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140

Reply via email to