Karl Semich: > Would it be reasonable for aufs to refrain from copying up if only the > ctime is changed? Perhaps a mount option to ignore isolated ctime > changes?
Hmm, I think I can understand your point. But it won't be so easy to decide because it is against a generic filesystem behaviour. Very basic behaviour: - on ext2 or something $ > fileA $ stat fileA $ sleep 1 $ chown $(id -u) fileA $ stat fileA - then you can see only ctime was changed. If we introduce "ignore_isolated_ctime_change" mount option, then this behaviour breaks. Ok, that is intentinal and won't be a problem. Hmm, I need to consider more about it. Give me some time. J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140
