Eddie Horng: > The patch works great! Applied the patch I can't reproduce the problem > anymore, when func(file, buf.u, size, pos) returns -EINTR, "if (err == > -EINTR && !au_wkq_test() ..." entered and I never see i>1 case. Is this > patch the final solution for this case?
Glad to hear that! Well, the patch is final, I think. But as you mentioned, i>1 case should not happen as far as I know. But I'd leave it as it is since it is something like a safe-guard for some unknown/future case like this problem. J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
