On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 18:25 +0200, Raphaël Pinson wrote:
> Well as I am thinking of how "mv" would work, it would actually make > sense to have it be a combination of a cp and a rm, since it could be > useful to have a "cp" command to duplicate a node. And since "rm" > already exists, I guess it wouldn't be hard to code rm as a sequence > of "cp" and "rm". > > What do you think? I would probably still implement them separately, simply because 'mv' doesn't need to involve a potentially costly tree copy. It shouldn't be too hard, and mostly only involve code in augeas.c in case you want to take a crack at it. David _______________________________________________ augeas-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
