I've finally committed and pushed this - sorry for the delay; part of it was that I actually wanted to sit down and understand Debian network config in more detail; that never happened. But from what I gather from the man page, the changes make perfect sense to me.
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 08:22 +1000, Matt Palmer wrote: > > > diff --git a/lenses/tests/test_interfaces.aug > > > b/lenses/tests/test_interfaces.aug > > > index 62bbd20..9495b4a 100644 > > > --- a/lenses/tests/test_interfaces.aug > > > +++ b/lenses/tests/test_interfaces.aug > > > @@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ module Test_interfaces = > > > # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). > > > # The loopback network interface > > > > > > -auto lo eth0 # Take me to the net > > > +auto lo eth0 #foo Just to help my understanding: this means that ifup -a should bring up the interfaces 'lo', 'eth0', and '#foo', right ? > Some better pre-inclusion QA of lenses would be appreciated. It's No Fun At > All loading up a lens that's part of the base distribution and having it > completely fail to work. I completely agree - the two problems we've had with that so far are (a) lack of expertise (e.g., calling me a Debian n00b is charitable) and (b) lack of people willing to do reviews. > Some sort of quality guidelines for lenses, and > perhaps a "beta" set of lenses that can be selectively enabled by the end > user, would make it clearer whether I can expect to be spending hours making > something work or not (and budget time appropriately). If I had known/understood the breakage, I would have probably fixed it myself ;) I agree though that a facility to indicate the stability and/or version of a lens would be useful. David _______________________________________________ augeas-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
