On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 03:11 +0200, [email protected] wrote: > However would the onlyif avoid unnecessary augeas calls?
Yes, it would - if nothing needs to be done, only one call would be made to evaluate the onlyif condition; I doubt that it will save any time though. > It looks a bit ugly to do all that, but if understood it correctly the > following reasons are responsible for it: Yeah, I wish I had a simpler way to express what the tree is supposed to look like, but don't really have a better language for that. There's probably also some room to make the language for the 'changes' parameter a little friendlier. Suggestions welcome ;) > The normal file is just a single value, however to add an additional > file to the logrotate, we need to transform this to a list. So we first > remove the list, then create it and afterwards fill it up? Yes, that's correct; this case is complicated by the fact that 'file' nodes need to come first underneath a 'rule' node. David _______________________________________________ augeas-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
