On 31/07/09 10:38, David Lutterkort wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:02 +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
---
augeas.spec.in | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/augeas.spec.in b/augeas.spec.in
index fa97590..206a824 100644
--- a/augeas.spec.in
+++ b/augeas.spec.in
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Source0:
http://augeas.net/download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: readline-devel libselinux-devel
+BuildRequires: bison flex
Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}
Why is this necessary ? The released tarball contains flex- and
bison-generated files, and should therefore not have a BR on bison/flex
(in addition, we'd get into hot water with some distros like RHEL4 that
ship bison/flex versions that are too old)
It's a fair point. Rebuilding the srpm on a machine without bison and
flex works fine, so they're not required in the spec file.
This came about because I often use a spec file to discover dependencies
for building a checkout. It seems the two don't necessarily have to
correspond.
Matt
--
Matthew Booth, RHCA, RHCSS
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team
M: +44 (0)7977 267231
GPG ID: D33C3490
GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490
_______________________________________________
augeas-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
