On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Raphaël Pinson < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi David, > > > Great to know that a release is on the way! > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:45 AM David Lutterkort <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> One thing that I didn't notice until now was that the Json lens has seen >> quite a bit of change and now accepts comments - while that's definitely a >> much nicer format than 'standard' Json, I wonder if it wouldn't be better >> to do that with a different lens, say 'JsonWithComments' and leave the >> existing Json lens as it was. >> > > I think that depends if one cares about validating the format using the > lens or not. Supporting comments only harms if you're using the lens to > make sure the file is standard Json, but I'm not sure sure Augeas is the > best tool for this anyway. > It also changes the structure of the tree, though it's all empty nodes. More importantly though, I always looked at it as a fairly straightforward example of how to use recursive lenses, and comments distract a bit from that. Would you be opposed to a PR that adds a JsonCComments lens and restores the Json lens to just plain old json ? > On another subject, I'd have loved to get the Lua features in Augeas 1.5, > but I'm not sure in what form this would happen anymore… > >From the PR, it looks like htere's still a bit of work left, right ? David
_______________________________________________ augeas-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
