2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:05 AM, BaSh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Callan, > > I think this patch isn't necessary: Packages->OutOfDate is default 0 > > in the database. > > > > Regards, > > Andrea > > > > 2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't think of a case where > > > this isn't a good idea and a lot of people complain about it > > > (stonecrest). > > > > > > -- > > > Callan Barrett > > > > > This is for when a pkgbuild is updated, not initially submitted. At > the moment the default behavior is to leave a package as Out-of-date > when a new package is uploaded to update an old one. If this is what > you meant I don't really follow why the patch isn't necessary. Ops...excuse me, i didn't look it is for when a pkgbuild is updated :)
Andrea -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User: #430842
