On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:14:22AM -0400, Loui wrote: > This is a different patch from the one in the bug tracker > (implementation looks a little cleaner). Do you have the same qualms > about this one? I think there should be a way of specifying more info > in the search. What's good about this method is that it will only > return what's needed, no more, no less. > I think it adds needless complexity, why not just return all data on the specified packages?
> I guess what we could really use are examples of it's usage and > potential abuse. At least with this method the server won't be > hit as hard as if the client did the search and requested info for > every single search result. > Bandwidth is cheap, it's mostly looking up on one table for package info, it's not really a performance hit to return more info. -S
pgpw7yO6Bpyde.pgp
Description: PGP signature
