On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:26:11 +0100, Alexander Rødseth <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > 2013/2/27 Angel Velásquez <[email protected]>: > > For solving the problem right now -quick and dirty-, we just have to > > add a validation (tsk tsk anyone who wants to sum contributions can > > code this silly patch), if the user is suspended don't let him flag > > the package and actually redirect him to the logout page (to kill > > those cookies). > > Wouldn't he/she/they be able to just register more accounts and > continue flagging packages this way? > > > - Alexander So everyone know's I've renamed this mystery person... the AUR-Bandit (in my mind)
Adding to, what Alexander had mentioned, No matter what we do about the AUR-Bandit. They (refering to any future AUR-Bandits out there as an entity) find away around it. If not to do something silly/annoying, like flag all of mine / gtmanfred's / whoever-elses aur packages out of date, then just to say that they did. I don't know, maybe I just have little faith on people being nice. I mean it's the way it's always been I guess. -First you had to just hit <enter> -Then you had a click a box before you hit <enter> -Then you had to click a box and make sure you scrolled through the entire bs -they wanted you to read and hit <enter> -Then came e-mail comfirmation -Then captcha's -Next you will have to do a forward roll, the macarena, turn the lightswitch on/off 33 times, answer security question that asks: "What is your great-great-great Aunt's best friend's, first stuffed animal called?" (and no hints) /o\... I think you see what I'm getting at. -- Federico Cinelli <[email protected]> Arch Linux Trusted User (cinelli) GnuPG Key: 0xC6C11350 "Stay true."
pgpmR1ijoFm7F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
