> > [...] > > This kind of check would see files which are named e.g. lp:foo as > > not > > missing even if they are. > > Sure, we only check local files and lp:foo is a remote file. Checking > remote sources is something that we cannot do properly.
I did not suggest checking remote sources. My question was why excluding the check for files with "lp:" in their name. lp:whatever is a valid name for a local file, why should I expect them to be remote?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
