On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 at 22:46:45, Mikkel Oscar Lyderik wrote: > [...] > If it is intentional that it should be possible to use a different > domain then we can just drop this. However, then the documentation for > the JSON RPC should be updated instead to reflect this change, I don't > know what the best approach is but I assume it will break a bunch of > aur tools if it is left as it is now >
As far as I know, there is no (official) documentation of this field. Only its name which indicates that the field contains a URL. It does not imply that the URL is relative, though. > > However, shouldn't it be sufficient to just change the default > > value and use relative URIs (with absolute paths) on the package details > > pages as well? > > > > I agree. I'll correct this if the patch is relevant at all. > [...] Yeah, I don't see any disadvantage in dropping the domain name from the default value. If it fixes some AUR helpers, let's do that. Regards, Lukas
