On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Ronald van Haren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I've been a bit busy and kinda forgot about this thread. > Well, as we already did our last vote on the AUR I don't think it is > needed to vote for it as nobody complained about it. > If someone has the superpowers to do so (or do I have to contact simo > for it?) I suggest he changes the bylaws to incorporate the AUR voting > mechanism, and please also change the name of the mailing list in the > bylaws. > > If someone feels a vote is still needed, feel free to start the vote. > > > @ Callan > Don't worry about it, a bit of manual work is not so bad. One thing > which could be quite handy is a way to see for everyone who has votes > and who did not. Do you think that would be hard to incorporate (I > really should look into the AUR code in the Summer holiday when I have > some more time) ? > > ronald > >
Not hard to incorporate, I've already done it somewhere. I guess I just need to find a more elegant way to put it in the AUR but aside from that it's done. -- Callan Barrett
