On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:23:32PM +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: > Yes just go for it. If someone was interested they should have stepped > forward by now. It's a pity though that we have these frequent > removals. It really would be better if we as a team would not add too > many non-popular packages. Ah well, that has been discussed before. Retiring TUs should really announce that they plan on leaving, allow other TUs to adopt packages, then move the rest to unsupported themselves, then finally quit.
- Re: [aur-general] orphans in community Hugo Doria
- Re: [aur-general] orphans in community Firmicus
- Re: [aur-general] orphans in community ivy . foster
- [aur-general] Orphans in community Ángel Velásquez
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in community Eric Belanger
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in community Geoffroy Carrier
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in community tschertel
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in community Ángel Velásquez
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in commu... Ronald van Haren
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in c... Loui
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in c... Ángel Velásquez
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in c... Abhishek Dasgupta
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in c... Andrea Scarpino
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in c... Abhishek Dasgupta
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in commu... Abhishek Dasgupta
- Re: [aur-general] Orphans in community Geoffroy Carrier
