Hi bardo, On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:15 PM, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So this means that the two systems can't coexist... I can't say I like > it (I may prefer to use a particular sound system for a certain > feature the other one misses) but at the moment I don't think there > are other solutions.
There are plans to make them coexist (namely the cuckoo driver), but currently, yes, they can't coexist by now. > We'll have to talk about that file (maybe in private, I'm hijacking > the thread and it isn't nice), in particular about the removal of > libflashsupport, which is also provided in libflashsupport-pulse, a > package I've been wanting to move to [community] for a while. > You are right, I was already thinking about that. I will contact you in private so we can think about a good solution. I was already thinking about splitting libflashsupport in a separate package anyway, because of the lib32-* dependency it would need to work in x86_64 architecture. --- Hi Jeff, On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Jeff Mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:41, Paulo Matias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Surely I will only add it to [community] if I get explicit permission >> from the copyright holder (Tuomov), and if he confirms everything >> complies with the trademark license. As I said, I don't want to >> disrespect anyone's license. > > You are not disrespecting the license of Ion3, you are just ignoring > the decision that has already been made. Don't put ion3 in > [community]. If a package is removed from [core]/[extra] because of a > change in it's license, don't go putting it back in [community]. OK, sorry for misunderstanding, I thought the problem was only license-related. --- Best regards, Paulo Matias
