> -----Original Message----- > Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:23:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] AUR CleanUp Day v2 > From: "Ronald van Haren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] style="margin:0px;"> > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <[email protected]>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:05 PM, DaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/10/7 Ángel Velásquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This idea was originally sent in this thread: > >> > >> http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-May/007539.html > >> > >> At the end, we didn't decide a final day, but the work was done, so I > >> propose another CleanUp Day following the model that we used the last time. > >> > >> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_CleanUp_Day --> here you can obtain > >> information and put suggestion, ideas, etc. > >> > >> What do you recommend to maintain a more efficient thread?, a post on the > >> forum ? and what do you suggest for the Day that we will do the clean.?. > >> > >> Opinions are open!. > > > > I know that isn't the right thread but.... What about another BugDay? > > IMHO it have an high priority than cleanupday > > > I think a bug day is a good idea indeed (preferebly on a Sunday as I > have most time on that day). > About a cleanup day, maybe it is a better idea to better inform the > users we have such a wikipage where packages can be added (and yes we > should actually better maintain that wikipage and pay more attention > to it). Maybe a sticky in the 'forum and aur discussion part of the > forum). That is just an idea though that comes to mind. > Ronald Hello, I dislike the idea of a bug day. We have well defined bugtracking interfaces (Community Bugtracker or AUR comment-pages). The AUR cleanup day was announced on the Arch Linux start page at www.archlinux.org. We can do that again, but I think the problem was not that there are too few reactions of users on that announcement but too few TUs making a decision of packages to keep and packages to delete. We still have a rather long list of packages undecided on the wiki list and only a few under the lists "to be kept" and "to be deleted". So I agree with Ronald in his wish to have us pay more attention on the Wiki page. Regards Stefan
