On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:23 PM, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the only work done is in AUR2, but I don't know if they have > touched the backend. Could any of the involved people update us on its > status?
What AUR2? > Here I agree with Loui: it doesn't make sense to separate the AUR and > the [community] backend, they are tightly coupled and so they should > be. The risk is to break things if two groups move independently. > And I'm not really sure we could reuse some code, but writing an SCM > abstraction layer that makes us independent from CVS and SVN could be > userful for the main repos, too. I don't think it's a stupid idea > because we just need the basic operations that every SCM provides... Also if we're talking about AUR2 I think the plan is definitely to separate them, but when that happens there won't be two sets of queries but rather abstracted. -- Callan Barrett
