On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:54 AM, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - bardo drunk too much wine and was having difficulty spelling. > >> - It was proposed to add a safe flag on TUs packages in the AUR to encourage >> TUs to leave packages out of community while still being marked in a way as >> they are known to be good PKGBUILDs > > I missed this part... luckily. Safe flags were happily killed with a > few months ago. If you mean to add them to [community] packages only, > then it doesn't make sense to me: to make a TU you don't just need the > User, you also need the Trust. Either you don't T the U from the > beginning (and s/he doesn't get elected) or you T, and then you don't > need to flag anything. If someone notices an anomaly in a TU's > PKGBUILD quality, it should readily be reported to the list to take > action. >
I believe the idea was to have some automatic indicator saying that the produced PKGBUILD was produced by a TU / Dev, and hence safe. Ronald
