On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Daenyth Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 13:01, w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > When I voice an opinion I am told I am making "wild claims", yet your > entire > > proposal is based on a claim that things "will get out of hand". In 5 > years > > they have not gotten out of hand. IN fact the evidence is that this > proposal > > is NOT needed at this time becuase there is NO resource issue at this > time. > <snip> > > Regards; > > Bob Finch > > Regarding your claim that things have never gotten out of hand: What > part of the 29-hour downtime caused by the community repo do you not > consider "out of hand" > Out of context. As the "wild claims" I was accused of making related to resource issues. (I.e. Stuff like hardware and so forth) I have never made that claim concerning background coding. Lou and I were speaking about the abuse by the TUs of the repo. Regards; Bob Finch P.S... Adopting your proposal will NOT eliminate that kind of outage either. Just delay it. That is unless we all agree to limit the repo to a particular size. That is NOT part of your proposal as it is currently manifest.
