-----Original Message----- > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:59:10 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Community and the AUR (Was: Vote - Moving > [community] to use same system as main repos) > From: Allan McRae <[email protected]> > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > <[email protected]>
> Loui Chang wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 03:36:56PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > > > > Loui Chang wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:51:40PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as the web changes go, I suggest the relevant AUR > > > > > developers talk to the people who do the Arch site work and > > > > > sort this out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well it depends. Do we want [community] to remain in AUR so we > > > > keep votes and comments and such, or do we drop those packages > > > > from AUR? > > > > > > > > > > > One thing I think no-one has brought up regarding this. The main > > > repos don't have package categories. So how would the AUR handle > > > that? > > > > > > > I think the categories would be removed. > > > > Any other people want to comment on this? Any TUs feel keeping AUR > pages for [community] packages is necessary? > > Allan > > Hello, I do not get bugreports, but I get AUR comments for my packages. So people seem to use them. I think they should be kept. Categories con be removed IMHO. Regards Stefan
