On 2/4/09, Javier Vasquez <[email protected]> wrote: > ... I'm wondering why gphotfs was removed from AUR. Was it due to lack of > users or lack of maintainers, or because what the packet provided is > now provided by gphoto2 of libgphoto2? > > Just to find out whether I need my own version of gphotofs, or it's no > longer needed, :) ...
The packet is back in AUR, :-), it was out like for a week or so... I guess the packet is still required for those using gphotofs (neither libgfphoto nor gphoto provide gphotofs functionality)... Thanks, -- Javier
