On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Invalid Archs >>> --------------- >>> arch-wiki-docs --> any >>> anki --> x86 >>> >> >> Fixed in cvs. BTW, don't use the 'any' arch. The repos don't have >> support for it. >> > > Which one did you fix? arch-wiki-docs? > I am curious and confused about the anki one. It appears as > unsupported on AUR : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14403 > It does not show up in the Integrity check 686 which makes me think it > might be a x86_64 only package. But why? And why is it also in > unsupported? > I tried to check the community webcvs, looking in the devel category > and a few others, I couldn't find any traces of that package. Btw > category makes it very painful to browse that tree, it is much better > with core/extra which don't have that directory structure. >
I fixed both. anki is in science (searching in /var/abs helps in these cases) . It needs to be built for i686, that's why it appears as unsupported in AUR (AUR only displays what's in community i686). I believe Tim doesn't have an i686 machine and doesn't use a i686 chroot.
