On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:01:46AM +0200, M Rawash wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 19:57 +1930, Angel Velásquez wrote: > > > it's *not* a duplicate, i just cited the lack of updates as one of the > > > reasons i forked the package, you can review sunjdk here: > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25303 > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > IMO this is a duplicate effort, because this package provided the same > > as existent packages (jre,jdk) in repos, and btw you can't use the > > "Maintainer tag" since this isn't a binary package and you aren't a > > TU/Dev > > > > Thanks for your effort, anyway > > frankly, i'm not really sure if the Maintainer/Contributor tags signify > anything other than 'current maintainer'/'former contributor', i didn't > even know there was a debate about it..
It's an issue for some people because namcap has some odd quirks about it.