Also, is it bad to name stuff like openoffice.org3? I mean, 3 is the latest, right? What happens when 4 comes out? Aren't versions already in the package...
-AT On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Evangelos Foutras <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> >> On 25/05/2009, Nick F0x <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> there are 2 PKGBUILD of one office suite - "OpenOffice.org russian >>> build from infraresource". >>> I mantain one of them openoffice.org3-infra-ru >>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20967), second - >>> openoffice-infra-ru (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10301) >>> is orphaned. >>> i think openoffice-infra-ru must be removed as duplicate. >>> >>> >> >> Why you didn't adopt the openoffice-infra-ru package instead of added a >> new one? >> >> IMHO you should adopt openoffice-infra-ru and update it with your >> pkgbuild, then I (or a TU) will remove openoffice3-infra-ru from AUR. >> > > I was a bit trigger-happy and removed openoffice-infra-ru. :( > > The files are still available at > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openoffice-infra-ru/ though. So, if Nick > F0x agrees, it can be re-uploaded and maintained by him. >
