Am Samstag 04 Juli 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: > I dont apply any extra patches, one of them break the corrected issue > for jmicron on device names. > > I'll try to find the one that causing this and report it. > > > 2009/7/4 Tobias Powalowski <[email protected]>: > >> Am Donnerstag 02 Juli 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: > >>> Hi > >>> I have tested the testing package, and it does not work. > >>> Same problem as dmraid rc14 with jmicron : whitespaces in devices name > >>> ( "jmicronRAID0 p1" ) > >>> So back to my own package of dmraid rc15. As soon as I get back my > >>> install running - I still have to remake initram with my working dmraid > >>> ( yeah yeah I should not test here ... :) ) - I will send you my > >>> pkgbuild if you want. > >>> > >>> 2009/7/2 Antoine Noal <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> > Hi > >>> > I have tested the testing package, and it does not work. > >>> > Same problem as dmraid rc14 with jmicron : whitespaces in devices > >>> > name ( "jmicronRAID0 p1" ) > >>> > So back to my own package of dmraid rc15. As soon as I get back my > >>> > install running - I still have to remake initram with my working > >>> > dmraid ( yeah yeah I should not test here ... :) ) - I will send you > >>> > my pkgbuild if you want. > >>> > > >>> > 2009/6/21 Tobias Powalowski <[email protected]> > >>> > > >>> > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: > >>> >> > Additional p ? What do you mean ? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > 2009/6/4 Tobias Powalowski <[email protected]> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: > >>> >> > > > Ok then so I can tell you that on arch64 with a jmicron > >>> >> > > > chipset it's working fine. > >>> >> > > > I'll send you all the needed info you want later, I'm not on > >>> >> > > > my box > >>> >> > >>> >> now > >>> >> > >>> >> > > but > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > I haven't applied any extra patchs. > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > 2009/6/4 Tobias Powalowski <[email protected]> > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: > >>> >> > > > > > Hi > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > I flagged out of date dmraid quite some time ago because I > >>> >> > > > > > had > >>> >> > >>> >> to > >>> >> > >>> >> > > build > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > > my > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > own package for dmraid rc15. > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Indeed, in order to make my software raid work with a > >>> >> > > > > > Jmicron > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > chipset, > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > > > an important fix was necessary. > >>> >> > > > > > ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219058 ) > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Why the package is still oudated ? > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > I'm looknig for dmraid users, i can't test it, last time i > >>> >> > > > > bumped > >>> >> > >>> >> it > >>> >> > >>> >> > > > > to .15 and a lot of dmraid users had broken machines. > >>> >> > > > > We can do again a testrun if it works now better with some > >>> >> > > > > patches from redhat. > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > -- > >>> >> > > > > Tobias Powalowski > >>> >> > > > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > >>> >> > > > > http://www.archlinux.org > >>> >> > > > > [email protected] > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > Do you need the additional p too? > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > -- > >>> >> > > Tobias Powalowski > >>> >> > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > >>> >> > > http://www.archlinux.org > >>> >> > > [email protected] > >>> >> > >>> >> The new dmarid package is in testing, please test and give feedback, > >>> >> thanks > >>> >> greetings > >>> >> tpowa > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Tobias Powalowski > >>> >> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > >>> >> http://www.archlinux.org > >>> >> [email protected] > >> > >> What is the difference to my package? > >> It's the standard tarball with the most recent fedora patches. > >> greetings > >> tpowa > >> > >> -- > >> Tobias Powalowski > >> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > >> http://www.archlinux.org > >> [email protected] any status update on this, which one breaks it for you?
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
