On 14.07.2009 00:48, taptaptap dödödö wrote: > If not, it would be good :) > > Sincerelly, > Laszlo Papp > > 2009/7/13 Andrei Thorp <[email protected]> > > >> Excerpts from Daenyth Blank's message of Mon Jul 13 18:25:47 -0400 2009: >> >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 18:11, Andrei Thorp<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What would be nice is a TU standard for how long the person must not >>>> respond for before the package gets orphaned. Perhaps one week is too >>>> short, but it'd be nice to be consistent. >>>> >>> I usually say two weeks >>> >> Two weeks sounds like a good amount of time. Is there perhaps a wiki >> page people can think of to put this? >> -- >> Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (http://www.xandros.com) >> >> > > Just to let you guys know, I just caught the maintainer on IRC and he did indeed forget about his packages. Needless to say, the package in question is now mine (power to me!) and I will care for it like it is my only child.
-- Sven-Hendrik
