On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:32:12 -0700 Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Renaming packages is no longer necessary. In fact, the scripts require the > arch in the package now. You're using the same scripts which run the > official repos, so they should do things correctly. > > Note that existing packages are fine, but all packages in the future MUST > have the arch in the package name How are packages for "any" architecture currently handled? Are they duplicated for each architecture-specific repo?
