Do we really need a mechanism to let one person be able to mark the package as outdated? What about marking the package outdated only if a certain number of other users report it as such also? And even then, only if the user accounts marking them as such have not been generated recently?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Farhan Yousaf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Maybe ignoring him is the right approach here because that is probably > what > > he least wants/expects here? > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Andrea Scarpino <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > On 13/10/2009, solsTiCe d'Hiver <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > hi. > > > > there was this guy, nicknamed diblidabliduu on AUR. > > > > he bug me to update a package that i explained i have no reason to do > > > > so. he then repeatdly marked this package out-of-date. > > > > As the comments he made are gone i guess his account has been > deleted. > > > > > > > > but this package has again been marked out-of-date by jfdlksafdskjl. > i > > > > guess he's back. please delete this account > > > > > > > I suspended jfdlksafdskjl account. > > > > > > Probably he will continue with this flame, what we can do here? > > > > > > -- > > > Andrea `bash` Scarpino > > > Arch Linux Developer > > > > > > > It's cheerless, such people may exist :( In the worst case he will do it > for > all packages. Am I too pessimistic ? :) > > Best Regars, > Laszlo Papp >
