Apparently, no you did not. I maintained the chromium-snapshot package and I haven't got any mail from anyone related to the package in the past 24 hours. I know my email is correct in my AUR account as I recieve out-of-date notifications and comment notifications just fine.
2009/10/21 Biru Ionut <[email protected]> > On 10/21/2009 02:23 AM, Panos Filip wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Biru Ionut<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> HI, >>> i'm opening this subject again. sorry for that. >>> >>> i want to delete them tonight and i want to ask you guys which is the >>> best >>> package to have(and renamed) conform this proposal: >>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Chromium_proposal >>> >>> chromium-browser-svn will not be deleted. >>> chromium-bin i can't choose one from that list because i don't know which >>> one is good. just tell me which one and i'll email the maintainer to >>> upload >>> with a different name. >>> >>> -- >>> Ionut >>> >>> >> I think that the best is: >> >> 1) ONE chromium-browser-bin-latest, because -latest- will make clear that >> it >> isn't a stabilized or stable release and it will download the ... latest. >> The one that Stefan Husmann suggests is the best I suppose. And it should >> be >> the zip from googlebot. It's the (2) (the svn build) in zip. >> 2) ONE chromium-browser-svn : it exists. No problem. It can be built >> succesfully on x86_32 and x86_64. >> > > > i've deleted all packages. Now we have only two packages: > chromium-browser-bin > chromium-browser-svn > > Email sent to all maintainers explaining why i did that. Hope that they > understand and doesn't upload any chromium packages. > > -- > Ionut >
