On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Andrea Scarpino <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/11/2009, Chris Brannon <[email protected]> wrote: >> -1. There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody: >> *intentional harm* to the distro. >> >> But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was >> inactive. > No problem if they are inactive. Everyone can be busy. > But they should flagged theirself as inactive. > We have a TU Bylaws[1] that speak up. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html > > -- > Andrea `bash` Scarpino > Arch Linux Developer >
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-May/004850.html
