On Tue 10 Nov 2009 08:12 -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:42, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Chris Brannon <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> 2. luaexpat is required by all the prosody packages, whereas lua-expat > >> is only required by lua-gtk. > >> > > > > lua-expat : provides=(luaexpat) > > > > Does the AUR parse provides= when listing depends? Pacman can use that > info *if it's in a repo*, but can the same be said for AUR?
No, but that is something you should write when renaming a package. And I don't think we should keep badly named packages around. Change 'em and let the dependents catch up. This is 'unsupported' after all.
