On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Ranguvar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Also, I filed a bug <http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16165> for the
> speedup
> > of Vim package building, and wrote a new script to handle fetching
> patches,
> > which was much faster than the original (until another user used a better
> > idea to make a far better package :p).
>
> Just FYI, the topic was brought up to arch-dev-public ML, but it
> pretty much died.
> This is my last mail in the thread which remained unanswered :
>
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-October/013865.html
>
> Anyway someone who wants to build/rebuild vim himself can simply use
> the following AUR packages instead of the official ABS one :
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30507
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31000
>

I hope that the Vim issue gets resolved soon, Xavier.  I like your approach
to the problem (VCS) :)


2009/11/17 Angel Velásquez <[email protected]>

> I agree! then I won't delete by accident his packages ! haah (sorry
> for this again :P)
>
> Good luck! <http://www.angvp.com/>
>

And Angel, it's not a big deal xD  Thanks, though :P


Thanks to all of you, for your kind words :)
-- Ranguvar

Reply via email to