> I know there's been a couple of applications in the last few days, and > another has just started, so please don't be annoyed. The unlucky TU this > time is Chris Brannon
I'm glad to sponsor Ray's application. His packaging skills are excellent. He's competent, and he has a good attitude. Ray will make a great addition to the team. This begins the discussion period. > 1) I remember we used to tell each other that we don't need to state > dependencies from [core] in AUR, how true is this? Are we looking at just > the base group or is it totally a matter of consistency? I've heard arguments in favor of including dependencies from the base and base-devel groups. Some constrained environments, such as live CDs, might not have all of base and base-devel installed. Perhaps it's better to specify things explicitly. This topic seems to be perennial. -- Chris
