On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Ranguvar <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > 2009/12/16 Sergej Pupykin <[email protected]>: >> Hello, >> >> the voting period for djszapi has ended, and he did not get the majority >> of votes. He got >> >> Yes: 4 >> No: 9 >> Abstain: 5 >> >> It would be nice if there would be some discussion about the reasons for the >> failure. > > I've known djszapi for a few weeks now via IM. > I had not examined his packages in _great_ detail, but in person, > Laszlo appeared quite capable of TU work, especially considering his > extremely active involvement with the AUR2 project. > > I do not know of past issues, as I am still fairly new to Arch and > newer to acting as a TU, but there did not seem to be any major > blockers to provent Laszlo from becoming a TU, > and because he seems to have quite a bit of knowledge and dedication, > I voted 'yes' for his approval. > > Would someone who was around at the time then please summarize what > issues, if any, were present before? Has Laszlo already applied once > and been rejected, as it seems? > > -- Ranguvar
Laszlo has previously applied not long ago, maybe a month (search ML archive). Some concerns were brought up in a somwhat heated (IIRC) discussion period. Finally, he retracted his candidacy before the vote. I guess most TU had made up their mind at that point. So this time, they felt that nothing was left to discuss so everyone just waited for the voting period.
