On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Ranguvar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 16:32, Reqamst <[email protected]> wrote: > > There are two packages refering to "Django Command Extensions"[1] in AUR: > > "django-extensions"[2] and "django-command-extensions"[3]. I think > > "django-command-extensions" is more accurate. > > > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/django-command-extensions/ > > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26813 > > [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30353 > > > I'm not so sure. > > For one, django-extensions is older and better known. > For another, the site you linked talks about other extensions than > Command ones (Database Model Field, Database Model, Admin). > Are only the Command ones installed by the AUR packages? > > Thanks for bringing it to some attention whatever the choice, I/we hate > dups :) > > -- Ranguvar > [Devin Cofer] > If you check PKGBUILDs, you'll notice that they are exactly that same extensions - that same "url" und "source". Just django-extensions' PKGBUILD is better and more complex, but django-command-extensions' name is more accurate in compare to homesite. In that situations some kind of redirects would be useful - one pkgname could be just alias for second and users wouldn't have problems.
