On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM, garfiield <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello! > > Like the subject says, I am going to submit my first AUR > package dvtm-git [1]. But before I do that I would like to get some > questions answered. > > Questions: > Although dvtm [2] in AUR has the description "Dynamic virtual terminal > manager", I have chosen "Tiling window management for the console" as > the description of my package. My reason for choosing this description > is that _I think_ it is more descriptive than just giving the meaning of > the abbreviation "dvtm" (like the dvtm package does). > > * Should I go with my own description of the package or use the same > description as the dvtm package? (Maybe add some information to inform > that the source is a Git repository?) >
- your description is just fine, it is indeed more descriptive - the git part should already be obvious from package name > * What other improvements should or can I do to the package? > Looks perfect to me after just reading it. Maybe I wouldn't have used a scriptlet just to display this : echo "The configuration of dvtm is done by creating a custom" echo "config.h and (re)compiling the source code." I guess I would just put a comment in the pkgbuild. But it's up to you, there is not only one way to do things :) And another personal opinion : I find packages cumbersome when I have to change source code a lot :) But in that case, once you achieved a decent config, it's alright.
