On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 01:16:56PM +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Personally I think you're overcomplicating things.
I share this thought. > To me it seems the votes don't matter anyway. There are guidelines for > the number of needed votes afaik but from my limited experience > packages only get into community when a TU is interested in them, in > which case the votecount doesn't matter at all. I wish this would be different. I think the general idea that people express their support through a vote is good. I often install a package just to test it and to realize that I don't need it. Don't see why this should increase the popularity, one could argue it should decrease... What about votes that are valid two months + a monthly voting cronjob (the time spans are just exemplary)? Further I'd like to see a list of all packages I voted for, so far I was not able to get this - might be my lack of knowledge. -- Florian Friesdorf <[email protected]> GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: [email protected] OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
pgpZ9zWOTLVtM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
